Bishop Athanasius Schneider continues to give interviews and talks and refuses to affirm the Catholic Faith on exclusive salvation in harmony with Vatican Council II.Year in and year out he does the same thing.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider continues to give interviews ( Blog 1Peter 5) and talks (Voice of the Family Conference) and still refuses to affirm the Catholic Faith on exclusive salvation in harmony with Vatican Council II.Year in and year out he does the same thing and it is useful for many in the Church.

He does not respond to numerous reports on line and neither to e-mails sent to him.

So he is comfortable for the Latin Mass Society in England which will promote the Traditional Latin Mass without saying that Vatican Council II (AG 7) supports the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church on salvation.

Bishop Schneider will speak on general things.He will repeat his errors on Vatican Council II.He will not affirm EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century.So there is no rupture with the present leftist magisterium which he supports.

He will be in line with the present magisterium in interpreting Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past even though an alternative option exists.

He will be in line with the liberal magisterium in interpreting extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism.

So he is in heresy but it is overlooked since it is politically correct and supported by the two liberal popes.

Similarly LifeSites does not want to affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. So LifeSites is in a doctrinal schism with the popes of the past. So Bishop Schneider will not upset the cart.He gives Lifesites and the Latin Mass Society what they want.It is heresy but it is useful for every one professionally and financially. There are no charges against them from the Left.No one says they are being a bigot or racist .

It is like Michael Voris saying outside the Church there is no salvation and also meaning the baptism of desire refers to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So this is politically correct with the leftist hierarchy in Detroit.This is also the liberals and Mason's position on the new Catholic salvation doctrine.

There are so many reports on line which show that Vatican Council II and EENS can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion would be a rupture or continuity with Tradition.But for some reason Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec do not want to explore it. Suppose they did discover that I am correct would they affirm the traditional exclusivist understanding on salvation ? Roberto dei Mattei would not. He would not want to be called a Feeneyite.

So they all find Bishop Athanasius Schneider useful. He is saying nothing really on the issue of salvation.

Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism would be saying all need faith and baptism for salvation and with Feeneyism, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc are not objective cases in 2018.So they are not exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma EENS. This would mean all the non Catholics in Kazakhstan are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions according to Vatican Council II.

Maike Hickson is not going to ask him to affirm this and neither will she do so. Even Joseph Shaw at Oxford needs his job . He has a family to support like Michael Matt and Christopher Ferrara. So the truth could be inconvenient. 

This is why it is useful to have Bishop Schneider as a speaker every year, since for him, 'it would not be charity'  to speak the truth on the issue of salvation in the Catholic Church.This suits everybody-except me.

-Lionel Andrades

 MAY 17, 2018

Rome Life Forum speakers violate Principle of Non Contradiction and their conscience does not trouble them

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/roma-life-forum-speakers-violate.html

MAY 18, 2018

The International Theological Commission(ITC), Vatican made an objective error in two of its theological papers and Catholic parents can correct the error when teaching the Faith to their children : Voice of the Family , Rome Life Forum ignores this family issue

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/the-international-theological.html

JULY 18, 2016

Bishop Schneider, John Henry Weston ambiguous : 'speak the truth of the Catholic faith, to end doctrinal confusion, to restore clarity'http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/bishop-schneiderjohn-henry-weston.html

MARCH 15, 2018

I am waiting for Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider, Robero dei Mattei and Chris Ferrara to affirm Vatican Council II and the strict interpretation of EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/i-am-waiting-for-cardinal-burke-bishop.html

NOVEMBER 20, 2017

Bishop Athanasius Schneider acts as if he still does not know or understand the precise fault in the interpretation of Vatican Council II which results in a rupture with Tradition  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/bishop-athanasius-schneider-acts-as-if.html

Click on these  link to access         Bishop Athanasius Schneider (27)  Bishop Athanasius Schneider still at sea (6) Bishop Athansius Schneider (24)

Pentecost May 20, 2018 : Catholic parents when you teach your children avoid the error made by the International Theological Commission, Vatican

MAY 18, 2018

The International Theological Commission(ITC), Vatican made an objective error in two of its theological papers and Catholic parents can correct the error when teaching the Faith to their children : Voice of the Family , Rome Life Forum ignores this family issue

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/the-international-theological.html

________________________________

JULY 4, 2017

Rational and traditional Catholic apologetics based on Feeneyism and not Cushingism  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rational-and-traditional-catholic.html

DECEMBER 1, 2017

The lex orandi lex credendi of Catholics today is based on irrational Cushingite theology.The Feeneyite alternative is ignored by all

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/the-lex-orandi-lex-credendi-of_1.html

JANUARY 6, 2018

'He that believeth in him is not judged. But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God.'   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/he-that-believeth-in-him-is-not-judged.html

Pentecost Sunday May 20,2018

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH             SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

 MAY 15, 2018

Pentecost May 20 2018 : Invisible cases of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Invisibili casi di battesimo di desiderio,invincible ignorance ecc.non sono eccezione per il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/pentecost-2018-invisible-cases-of.html

Pro choice campaign summed up in one photo

HerzMariae

The pro choice campaign summed up in one photo.

No comment.

https://gloria.tv/language/S2mQ8XjTcSwL3q8noxk8XEbJo

https://gloria.tv/photo/1XfAE9A4YFdVEhPqA8nRuTBjR

The International Theological Commission(ITC), Vatican made an objective error in two of its theological papers and Catholic parents can correct the error when teaching the Faith to their children : Voice of the Family , Rome Life Forum ignores this family issue

The International Theological Commission(ITC), Vatican made an objective error in two of its theological papers and there is no denial from the offices of Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria s.j.Catholic parents can now correct this error when teaching the Faith to their childrenThe Voice of the Family conference which concludes today can acknowledge the mistake.

POPE BENEDICT AND CARD.LADARIA MADE AN 
OBJECTIVE ERROR IN ITC PAPERS.

Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria at the ITC both made a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.All these years they allowed Catholic families to teach this error to their children at home and in religion  class at school.

The Vatican Curia also wanted the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) to affirm Vatican Council II with this error.The SSPX is already interpreting Vatican Council II with the mistake but rejects the non traditional conclusion while the Vatican accepts it.It is the same with Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider speakers at today's conference whose position on Vatican Council II is not clear.

The Vatican Curia has been informed about this but will not make the correction.

DI NOIA ASSURES LA STAMPA VATICAN COUNCIL II WILL BE INTERPRETED ONLY WITH THE PREMISE

During the SSPX-Vatican negotiations, a few years back, Archbishop Augustine Di Noia assured the leftist newspaper La Stampa that there would be nothing in the agreement with the SSPX, which would hamper Vatican-Jewish Left relations.He meant Vatican Council II would continue to be interpreted with the false premise ( the baptism of desire refers to known people saved outside the Church) and not without it (there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire).

POSSIBILITIES KNOWN ONLY TO GOD ARE ASSUMED TO BE KNOWN ON EARTH TO HUMANS.

1) Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria assumed possibilities of salvation known only to God, were known people, non Catholics in the present times, saved outside the Church.This is false. There are no such personally known cases.But they assumed that there are  non Catholics,objectively visible, who are exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).In this way they could create a hermeneutic of rupture with the past.Now the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Ecclesia Dei know that they have made a mistake.There is nothing they can say in their defence.This is a doctrinal issue.Yet the CDF is not asked for a clarification from the  Voice of the Family conference in Rome,again, this year.

INVISIBLE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS ASSUMED TO BE VISIBLE

2) The Vatican does not deny that they made a mistake in assuming invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) were visible exceptions to EENS.How can we see or meet people saved outside the Church with  BOD, BOB or I.I when they are in Heaven? This cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.This is also being overlooked by Roberto dei Mattei one of the speakers at the conference today.He wrote books interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise.Now that he is informed he will not interpret the Council without the irrational premise which creates a rupture with Tradition.Nor will he admit that he had made a mistake all these years.

LUMEN GENTIUM  8 ETC PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION VIOLATED

3)Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria do not deny that they wrongly assumed LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc were examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions to EENS.This was there mistake.Since LG 8 etc were not practical exceptions to EENS in 1949 or 1965.So how can Catholics in good conscience promote this error  ? To assume physically invisible people who are now in Heaven are physically visible and real  exceptions to EENS on earth, violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.

The CDF and Ecclesia Dei agree with me but they cannot admit it in public.This is a conscience issue.

They know that their interpretation of Vatican Council II these 50 years was wrong but they cannot announce it in public.It would affect Vatican -Jewish Left relations.

BOD, BOB, I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc are harmless, speculative cases and never ever were exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT PAST ECCLESIOLOGY

So with the past ecclesiology not contradicted by Vatican Council II or BOD, BOB and I.I, there can only be an ecumenism of return.Protestants and Orthodox Christians are outside the Catholic Church according to EENS and the past ecclesiology.When will Cardinal Burke,Bishop Schneider, Life Sites and Famiglia Domani discuss this?

With the old ecclesiology intact, before and after Vatican Council II ( without the premise) the priority still is the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.

SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING NOT SUPPORTED BY POPE BENEDICT IN NEW BOOK

The Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State was not mentioned by Pope Benedict in his new book recently launched before the Italian Senate in Rome.Since for him there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church and so the past ecclesiology is rejected by him and other liberal theologians.

If people can be saved outside the Catholic Church and be known to human beings, according to him(which is false), then why have mission he asked ( March 2016, Avvenire).For him there is a development with Vatican Council II, interpreted with the premise.

THERE CAN BE NO NEW ECUMENISM WITH ECCLESIOLOGY THE SAME AS BEFORE

So now that we know that there are no known exceptions outside the Church to EENS and the past ecclesiology, now that we know that we cannot physically see any one saved with BOD, BOB, I.I or LG 8 etc, we can ask Pope Benedict why should there be the New Ecumenism and not the Ecumenism of Return.

Why does he consider the Social Reign of Christ the King not necessary to proclaim when he does not know the name of any one seen in Heaven without the baptism of water? Why does he consider a speculative possibility as a known case of salvation outside the Church ? An exception has to be  physically visible, for it to be an exception to EENS. Only a physically visible and personally known person could be an exception to EENS in the present times.If someone does not exist he cannot be exception.

These are issues which need to be discussed with the CDF and Ecclesia Dei.

CATHOLIC PARENTS CAN RE-TEACH THE FAITH WITHOUT THE LIBERAL ERROR

When Protestants who contracep and abort are going to Heaven even when they are not members of the Catholic Church for the Vatican and speakers at the Voice of the Familiy Conference, then why ask Catholics not to abort and contracep ? 

The International Theological Commission(ITC), Vatican made an objective error in two of its theological papers and Catholic parents can correct the error when teaching the Faith to their children.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 17, 2018

The Council Fathers made the same objective errors in 1965 as did Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr.Luiz Ladaria s.j in the ITC theological papers

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/the-council-fathers-made-same-objective.html

MAY 17, 2018

Rome Life Forum speakers violate Principle of Non Contradiction and their conscience does not trouble them

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/roma-life-forum-speakers-violate.html

MAY 16, 2018

German President must respect Catholic beliefs before and after Vatican Council II :outside the Church there is no salvation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/german-president-must-respect-catholic.html


http://blog.messainlatino.it/2018/05/roma-life-forum-2018-in-diretta-3.html