Sunday, February 18, 2018

Blessed Pope Paul VI who is to be canonized approved a factual error in Vatican Council II and this cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.

Blessed Pope Paul VI who is to be canonized approved a factual error in Vatican Council II and this cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. The same error was overlooked by Blessed Pope Pius XII.He did not correct the objective mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston case.
The same false premise and false conclusion existed at the time of Pope John XXIII.He allowed it to pass.
By using an irrational premise i.e invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible, he created a new conclusion i.e there are exceptions to the traditional, 'strict' interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So from Pius XII to Francis, 'the Church' teaches there is known salvation outside the Church.There is salvation outside the Church. So all do not need to enter the Church in the present times. 
This is the false teaching widespread and it is being enforced by the Jewish Left  and those who oppose the canonization of Blessed Pius XII,for political reasons.
This is the Aryan- like heresy in the Church today and it is not being corrected my many people who know about it.They are good people who fear losing their reputation, careers or privileges in the Catholic Church.
Pope Paul VI was a Cushingite while I am a Feeneyite. The Catechisms can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism. I choose Feeneyism. Pope Benedict and Pope Francis choose Cushingism.
The liberal theologians at Vatican Council II chose to interpret the Catechism and magisterial documents with Cushingism. 
So like the Wikipedia entry on extra ecclesiam nulla salus  , for example, the two liberal popes interpret all references to invincible ignorance as being exceptions to EENS. In other words the reference is to physically visible and known people saved outside the Church. Even though these people would be in Heaven if they existed.Only with this inference can they suggest that there are  exceptions to EENS. So it is  concluded that Mystici Corporis, the Catechsim of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Council of Trent oppose the traditional interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation.
So whenever they read a reference to the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance immediately they picture a known person in their mind.
 But these magisterial documents do not state that they are a reference to a known person.Common sense tells us that they can only be hypothetical cases.
I repeat Mystici Corporis and the Catechism of Pius X for example, do not state that invincible ignorance is a reference to a known person saved outside the Church. The liberal theologians had to make this false inference.
So for me the Catechism of Pope Pius X supports the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.These Catechisms are Feeneyite.They say all need the baptism of water for salvation. All need to enter the Church with faith and baptism.
So I affirm Vatican Council II which is also Feeneyite for me.I do not reject the Council like the traditionalists do.
I affirm the Nicene Creed which is Feeneyite for me.But not so for the cardinals.
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J also recited the Profession of Faith when he accepted the office of Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith.However his understanding of the Nicene Creed is  Cushingite.
It is the same with the traditionalist bloggers. Ann Barnhardt, Louie Verrecchio, Hilary White and David Domet will  affirm the Nicene Creed and even make a Profesion of Faith - but their model is Cushingite. 
If I would ask them or Micnael Voris to please tell me are you saying that all non Catholics in the world in 2018 are on the way to Hell, with no known exception, unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water they would not anwer or say no...
They are Cushingites.This is to be expected.
So they deny the Nicene Creed (Feeneyite), EENS(Feeneyite), the Catechisms (Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). It would be the same with Bishop Bernard Fellay.Here Feeneyism refers to Tradition.
They are following the Cushingism of the popes from Pius XII to Paul VI to Benedict and Francis.
They are all in harmony with Magisterial heresy approved by the Jewish Left and so they are not told officially not to use the name Catholic. They can still call themselves Catholic and the Left will not object.
They may say that they affirm the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecumenism of return etc but for the Left this is meaningless. Since with Cushingism they deny what they affirm.So they are on board and they can offer the Tridentine Rite Mass.
Catholics must recognise that the popes made an objective error, a philosophical mistake in Vatican Council II and they simply cannot follow it to remain political correct. 
Fr.Leonard Feeney opposed Cushingism with reference to EENS and the Left excommunicated him. Archbishop Lefebvre opposed Cushingism in Vatican Council II(Cushingite) and he was excommunicated.They were excommunicated for their Catholic orthodoxy.They were being faithful to Tradition.
Today those Catholics who do not say that Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for saying all non Catholics are on the way to Hell(Feeneyism) will be penalised.Those who do not say they believe that there are known exceptions(Cushingism) to traditional EENS in Vatican Council II will be penalised in the Church.So today even the St. Benedict Centers are on board with the two Cushingite popes.
They must accomodate heresy at least if they want to hold a responsible position in the Church ( Parish Priest, Religious Superior, Rector, Bishop etc).
This was all condoned by Pope Paul VI who is to be canonised a saint.-Lionel Andrades


No comments: