Thursday, May 18, 2017

CMTV indicates initial apparitions at Medugorje are from God and the rest from....

Christine Niles wrote a moderate report on Medugorje and probably Michael Voris/Simon Rafe did not like it . I used a positive quote from it on my blog.Now she has had to write another report for CMTV. Here it is.

CMTV:

Final tally offers zero votes in favor of authenticity of 35 years' worth of alleged visions

Lionel: First of all lets be clear,the Ruini report was not issued this week or last week.It was elaborated on by Tornelli this week. But it's findings were there a long time back and they were always reported positively.Christine herself says that the initial apparitions were found to be genuine and that too from a majority of 13 members.
So my question is the same as the comment on CMTV by someone.It was knocked out.It makes me laugh. The commentor said, something like this, "CMTV you are saying that the initial apparitions were genuine and the rest are diabolical? Where is your sense of logic and proportion".That comment was removed and replaced with two other comments critical of Medugorje.
Any way , we agree that these are private opinions on CMTV just as the pope said his opinion was also private.These are my personal opinions too.
O.K. CMTV. The initial seven apparitions  were from God and the rest from the Devil!!-this is what you are saying.
____________________________
ROME (ChurchMilitant.com) - The results of the Vatican's official investigation into Medjugorje are in — and they paint an overall negative picture of the authenticity of the alleged Marian apparitions. The final tally on authenticity of apparitions from 1982 onwards resulted in zero votes in favor, two votes against, and 12 votes claiming no opinion could be given.
Lionel: This is CMTV's opinion.Pope Francis himself said that he wanted to respect the Ruini Commission and so he had not prohibited the apparitions.I think that the Masons would not want the seers to travel about and evangelise and pray with massive congregations at stadiums.They would not like Catholics to come back to the faith in hundreds of thousands. They would also consider these apparitions a block towards the one religion which Pope Francis seems to be promoting for them and CMTV does not report on it.So it is surprising that the pope still allows them to continue.
______________________________
The first seven apparitions, which reportedly took place in 1981, received a generally positive response, with 13 members of the Vatican commission voting yes as to their supernatural nature, one voting no, and one vote suspended. 
Lionel: The first seven were from God and according to CMTV the rest from Satan! Interesting.😄
________________________________
But the second phase — which include the 35 years from 1982 to the present day — received a strongly mixed reaction, including a final tally with zero votes in favor of the supernatural nature of the apparitions.
Lionel: They commented on the seven initial apparitions and did not do so with the rest of them, in thousands.It was was not practical. Cardinal Ruini and members of the Commission, liberals who have rejected 'the dogma of the faith' were there to give their private opinion on apparitions.They do not have a special charism to detect and authenticate the apparitions, which they do not receive. What would be their criteria for judging? Doctrine and theology? But Pope Francis rejects doctrine and theology in general and Cardinal Muller does not object there.Cardinal Muller interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism theology, which does not come from the Holy Spirit but human error; Rahner-Ratzinger error.
__________________________________
According to Vaticanista Andrea Tornielli, "the commission took note of the heavy interference caused by the conflict between the bishop and the Franciscans of the parish, as well as the fact that the apparitions, pre-announced and programmed individually for each seer, continued with repetitive messages."
Lionel: For those who follow the messages they are meaningful and not repetitive. Any way this is a qualification for rejecting the messages?
 _______________________________
In 1999, the Franciscans who served as spiritual advisors to the children were expelled from the diocese of Mostar-Duvno by their bishop, Ratko Peric, as well as by the Father General of the Order of Friars Minor, for disobedience. The Vatican approved the joint expulsion.
In 2008, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith launched an investigation into Fr. Tomislav Vlasic, spiritual director to the child visionaries, whose bishop suspended him "for the diffusion of dubious doctrine, manipulation of consciences, suspicious mysticism, disobedience toward legitimately issued orders," as well as charges of sexual immorality.
Lionel: So this has a bearing on the authenticity of the apparitions?
Fr. Tomislav Vlasic admitted he's been involved in New Age since 2002 — back when he was still spiritual advisor to the Medjugorje seers.
Lionel: So this proves that the apparitions are fake?! Otherwise why would they be mentioned here?
Vlasic was eventually defrocked by Pope Benedict in 2009. In 2012, Vlasic released a video promoting the New Age movement Central Nucleus, and admits he's been involved in this since 2002 — back when he was still spiritual advisor to the Medjugorje seers.
Lionel: He was one of many spiritual advisers to the seers.The others are still Franciscans in good standing. An extraordinary priest, Fr. Slavko Barbaric ofm, was also an initial spiritual director of the seers. He has expired.Possibly Our Lady was also appearing to him.I knew him well.He was a saint.
On this second phase of the purported apparitions, the Vatican committee voted on two separate issues: (1) spiritual fruits, and (2) the conduct of the seers. On spiritual fruits, six members voted positively, while the remaining 10 said the fruits were a mix of positive and negative.
Lionel: So there were spiritual fruits even though for CMTV after the seven apparitions monitored, the rest was from Satan. Including the one in this video below?


Mirjana allegedly "seeing" Our Lady

(Lionel :According to Michael  it would be Mirjana above allegedly seeing the devil).

As to the conduct of the visionaries, 12 members said no opinion could be given, while two voted against the supernatural nature of the alleged visions. 
Just as significant, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in charge of overseeing the faithful diffusion of Church teaching, is expressing skepticism over the authenticity of the Medjugorje visions. In Tornielli's words, Cdl. Gerhard Müller's opinion is "considered an authoritative contribution to be compared with other opinions and reports."
Lionel: Cardinal Muller has said that there will be no doctrinal judgment of the apparitions until they have ended.He has not condemned them with a negative verdict.
_______________________________
As critics have noted, the messages include questionable doctrinal content, including the fact that "Our Lady" regularly prays the "Our Father" with the seers — something Our Lady refused to do at the Church-approved apparition of Fatima, because it includes the line "forgive us our trespasses." As the Church teaches, Mary is without sin, so she could not ask for forgiveness of her sins.
Lionel: She was praying for the seers and us.
_________________________________
The Virgin also reportedly said, "All religions are equal before God" — espousing the heresy of indifferentism, explicitly condemned by the Church. She similarly remarked elsewhere, "It is you who are divided on this earth. The Muslims and the Orthodox, like the Catholics, are equal before my Son and before me, for you are all my children."
Lionel: I am glad it is said that she 'reportedly said'. When I personally asked Fr. Slavko Barbaric about this when I was in Medugorje, he denied it. He also denied other reports of this kind.
The Virgin also reportedly said, 'All religions are equal before God' — espousing the heresy of indifferentism.
Lionel: What about Pope Francis? No indifferentism and heresy has been noticed at CMTV? Only at Medugorje it is troublesome for CMTV?
She is also said to have offered the very protestant remark: "I do not dispose of all graces. ... Jesus prefers that you address your petitions directly to him, rather than through an intermediary."
Lionel: I don't remember this one and it was important for CMTV.
____________________________
In spite of the generally negative view of the vast majority of the Medjugorje apparitions, the Vatican must consider how to deal pastorally with the millions of pilgrims who flock to the Bosnian town each year. In this regard, 13 commission members voted in favor of lifting the ban for pilgrimages there as well as establishing the parish as a pontifical sanctuary, with oversight by the Holy See, and which would not denote any recognition of the authenticity of the apparitions.
Lionel: The Commission was in favour of lifting the ban on pilgrimages ?! This sounds a wee bit positive and in favour of Medugorje.The Commission wants pilgrims to officially go to Medugorje!?
____________________________
The final decision now rests with Pope Francis, who most recently appointed Poland's Abp. Henryk Hoser to undertake a special mission of the Holy See to "acquire more in-depth knowledge of the pastoral situation" and to "suggest any pastoral initiatives for the future." Hoser is expected to submit his conclusions to the Holy Father this summer, after which Pope Francis will make his decision.
On Saturday, on his return flight from Fatima, Portugal, the Holy Father expressed skepticism about Medjugorje.
Lionel: In what capacity does he express skepticism? Pope Francis does not have the supernatural ability to judge the apparitions.His statement indicates this. He cannot cite theology and doctrine as a measure, since he rejects both, openly.So what will be his criteria to judge Medugorje? Of course, it is only  'in my opinion'.
___________________________
"The report has its doubts, but personally, I am a little worse," he told reporters. "I prefer Our Lady as mother, our mother, and not Our Lady as head of the post office who sends a message at a stated time."
He continued, "This isn't Jesus' mother. And these alleged apparitions don't have much value. I say this as a personal opinion, but it is clear. Who thinks that Our Lady says, 'Come, because tomorrow at this time I will give a message to that seer?' No!"
Lionel: He has only a personal opinion as a pope. Pope John Paul II also had a personal opinion of Medugorje too and it was positive.
-Lionel Andrades

AND WHAT DO YOU DO ABOUT THESE EMBARASSING VIDEOS AND LINKS?


ITALIAN GIRL RAFFAELLA WHO WAS BLIND HAD HER SIGHT RESTORED IN A MIRACLE AT MEDUGORJE




 


Lame girl was healed during apparition in Medjugorje
http://www.medjugorje.ws/en/articles/silvia-busi-healed-in-medjugorje/ http://www.maryslandmovie.org/project/silvia-buso-padua/


 
Medugorje : Irish priest with cancer healed completely


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/why-medjugorje.html


AUGUST 7, 2015

MEDUGORJE TOUR LEADER IN LEBANON BECOMES A PRIEST AND ACCOMPANIES THE PILGRIMS THIS WEEK

HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.IT/2015/08/MEDUEGORJE-TOUR-LEADER-IN-LEBANON.HTML



June 8, 2016


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/over-600-cases-of-healings-in.html
Hingham father writes about miracle pilgrimage (Boston Globe)
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/south/2014/08/09/hingham-father-writes-about-miracle-pilgrimage-that-saved-him-from-metastatic-kidney-cancer/dwpSSOzZFqywaG3SkL9o3J/story.html

Video : Arthur Boyle Cancer Story at St. Agatha Parish (Youtube) 
https://youtu.be/lZktbnvBFw0
Medjugorje - Miracle of the Sun - May 2010 (1)
Miracle of Sun at Medjugorje -www.queridosfilhos.com.br
Sun Miracles captured on video!! (Medjugorje, Herzegovina) [Full Length]
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-silence-of-birds-powerful.html
Miracolo a Medjugorje - Dovete vedere questo per credere ... incredibile !!!





Sun Miracles captured on video!! (Medjugorje, Herzegovina) [Full Length]
June 28, 2016
MedjugorjeApparition Hill

The Silence of the Birds: the Powerful Experiences of an Atheist Doctor and Notre Dame’s Basketball Team in Medjugorje

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-silence-of-birds-powerful.html

MedjugorjevisionariesApparition


August 9, 2015

Medugorje inspires girl to become Carmelite nun in cloistered order.Some pilgrims have become priests

(20:55) She took the name of Sister Pia of the Queen of Peace her
 mission is also to pray for Our Lady's intentions  says
 Terezija Gaziova.Some ( pilgrims) have become priests.

-L.A




Motion in Polish Parliament (Sejm) needed supporting the Tridentine Rite Mass

Marek Jurek Sejm 2016.JPGMarek Jurek,former member of the Polish Parliament along with his new political party and the Justice and Law party, his old political party in Poland, could file a motion in the Sejm supporting the Tridentine Latin Mass with traditional theology and without the New Theology which is based on an objective and factual error.
Jurek could free the Traditional Latin Mass from the new irrational theology and allow it to be offered again, as it was done over the centuries in Poland.He could appeal to the Polish Parliament  to adopt a motion to support the TLM with its past ecclesiology; its past theology.He could also ask the President and Prime Minister of Poland to clarify the obvious.They could announce  that there are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the Polish saints.To assume that the baptism of desire is visible and an exception to the dogma EENS as it was known to St.Maximillian Kolbe, is an objective mistake in Poland today.This objective mistake is also being made by the Polish Conference of Catholic Bishops and in general by priests, nuns and the laity in Poland.
So he could ask the Sejm to clarify that Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate  2, Gaudium e Specs 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, refer to invisible and not visible people in 2017.So Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to St.Faustina Kowalska.Similarly there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995)  to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS as it was known to St. Stanislaus Kotska or the missionaries in 16th century Europe.The Sejm must clarify that according to pre and post Vatican Council II  theology accepted in Poland, all non Catholics need to convert into the Catholic Church as members, for salvation.The Catholic Church is the only Ark of Noah that saves in the Flood(CCC 845), God the Father wants all people to be united in the Catholic Church(CCC 845),Catholics are the new people of God, the Chosen People(Nostra Aetate 4).
Since there is no salvation outside the Church and nor the possibility of salvation according to the dogma EENS, there must be no separation of Church and State in Poland and the Sejm must proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation, as was recommended by the popes.
An appeal must be made to the members of the Sejm to affirm this traditional Catholic theology  and reject the New Theology which is based on hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire being visible exceptions to EENS.Invisible people saved in invincible ignorance are considered physically visible exceptions to no salvation outside the Church.This is not the irrational theology which should be permitted for the Traditional Latin Mass when it is offered in Poland or the European Parliament building.-Lionel Andrades


May 17, 2017
latin-mass


European Parliament approves Traditional Latin Mass with new ideology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/european-parliament-approves.html
May 17, 2017
 Image result for Photo of the Bishops of Poland in 2016
Poland consecration to Christ the King : Collegiality in Vatican Council II is no more an issue when there is unity on correct doctrine.   


May 16, 2017
Image result for Photos Beata Szydlo,of Polish Parliament with President Duda

Polish bishops and President are also part of 'the false church': interpret the Catechism(1995) differently

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/polish-bishops-and-president-are-also.html

May 15, 2017

 Polish Bishops with President and Prime Minister Proclaim Jesus Christ King of Poland

Common mistake even the bishops and President of Poland need to address http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/common-mistake-even-bishops-amd.html

 May 8, 2017

Image result for Photo of Pope John Paul II with Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Bishop Schneider did not tell the Polish people that John Paul II made a theological mistake.Vatican Council II does not contradict the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/bishop-schneider-did-not-tell-polish_8.html

No canonical status for the SSPX this year.Reconciliation talks have failed.Doctrine divides for a corrupt magisterium

Image result for Photo of Bishop Fellay Church Militant TV agreementNo canonical status for the SSPX this year.The reconciliation talks have failed. They can no more come into the Church without accepting a Vatican Council II which is a rupture with Tradition.Doctrine divides for a corrupt magisterium and the SSPX can no more be faithful Catholics to get a personal prelature, since it would be 'triumphalistic'.Being faithful Catholics would be triumphalistic  for Pope Francis and the Conference of Bishops throughout the world.The conferences are a magisterium in rebellion. They are examples of collegiality based on false doctrine.

The Bishops Conferences want the SSPX to compromise on doctrine and not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism i.e  without the false premise and conclusion.So re-union with Rome is now not imminent as it was reported a few months back.
Pope Francis wants the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to come into the Church rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Pope Benedict clarified it in March 2016. So the SSPX cannot accept EENS like the missionaries in the 16th century since Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) i.e invisible cases are visible exceptions to EENS, this is the official line, they call this nonsense ' a development of the dogma'.
Feeneyite EENS is prohibited.The SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 which doctrinally affirmed Feeneyite EENS was rejected by the  liberal and corrupt magisterium at the Vatican.The corruption is being implemented throughout the Catholic Church.Even the Polish Bishops Conference in Catholic Poland is following the poltically correct heresy.
VORIS ALSO ACCEPTS FALSE DOCTRINE
Even Michael Voris at Church Militant TV has accepted the false doctrine and so is not excommunicated or declared 'not a Catholic', by the Archbishop of Detroit,USA.Michael has said that every one does not need to be a card carrying member of the Church for salvation.That got him off the hook.He means being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are known exceptions to the dogma EENS, even though these cases do not exist in our reality for them to be exceptions.Simon Rafe also accepts this politically correct position of the Left.This is being politically correct with Satan and the Masons, who allow CMTV to operate normally and call them self Catholics.
CMTV DOES NOT SAY POPE FRANCIS IS INDIFFERENT OR HERETICAL
Michael Voris can criticize the alleged indifferentism at Medugorje but not the indifferentism and heresy of Pope Francis, when he returned from Fatima recently, and called the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, 'triumphalism'.CMTV is not triumphalistic.They have gone out of their way to show this to everyone who matters.They do not affirm Feeneyite EENS theologically.They do not affirm the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS without mentioning any invisible case being a visible exception to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.
The SSPX now is not to be given a personal prelature unless they reject the dogma EENS like the two popes and all the Conferences of Catholic Bishops.
They have to accept the Cushingite theology of Vatican Council II and not interpret the Council with Feeneyite philosophy i.e invisible people cannot be exceptions to EENS, a baptism of desire case cannot exist in our reality, it is not personally known and physically seen  in 2017 for example, for it to be relevant or an exception to EENS.So there are no exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.The SSPX has to affirm the opposite even though it is irrational and fantasy theology.
They have to announce that St.Ignatius of Loyola and St. Francis of Assisi were triumphalistic.Since they did not interpret EENS with the irrational premise.
Now the SSPX has to compromise on doctrine like the FSSP priests and CMTV to have their situation regularised.
Even the traditionalists Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary(MICM) , the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney,have compromised.They do intepret EENS triumphalisticaly (and God bless them for this) but they interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, 'without triumphalism'.They assume LG 16, LG 98 UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11 etc refer to visible cases in 2017.Vatican Council II( Cushingite) becomes a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).They criticize Vatican Council II. They criticize Vatican Council II in general without specifying if they refer to Vatican Council II Feeneyite or Cushingite.
Sounds complicated?
 The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the St.Benedict Centers in the USA, affirm EENS in line with the missionaries of the 16th century, the magisterium of that time and that of the centuries past.But this is not how Pope Benedict and Pope Francis interprets EENS.The popes are Cushingite on EENS and so reject the past ecclesiology which had its foundation on EENS. The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are Feeneyite on EENS and so would not reject the past ecclesiology on an ecumenism of return and there being no salvation for Christians and non Christians, unless they enter and remain in the Church as members.This was being a traditionalist.This was the ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass.Unfortunately, they also interpret Vatican Council II like Pope Benedict and Pope Francis and consider it a rupture with the 16th century interpretation of EENS.They are all Cushingites on Vatican Council II.They are Cushingites on Vatican Council II and Feeneyites on EENS. The two popes are Cushingites on Vatican Council II and EENS.
Even the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II like the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary: with Cushingite theology.But unlike the MICM at the St. Benedict Centers they reject Vatican Council II completely.The MICM vaguely and confusedly accept Vatican Council II and so are recognised in the diocese of Manchester and Worcester,USA .They are not opposed by the Catholic Bishops Conference in Boston which will oppose the SSPX.
The Jewish Left is not allowing the MICM and the SSPX to hold a conference to discuss this issue.They would be considered Anti-Semitic and it would expose the treachery of the ecclesiastical Masonry within the Church.The MICM community of Fr. Leonard Feeney in Worcester,USA has full canonical status unlike the SSPX.They are traditionalists who in public accept Vatican Council II theologically, even though it is a rupture with Tradition.Privately they may express  reservations.In public they are not triumphalistic on Vatican Council II. Unlike me they do not say that Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) is in perfect harmony with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.-Lionel Andrades