All Catholics should proclaim that all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics, with no exceptions in 2017, are oriented to the fires of Hell and this is a magisterial teaching according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14)
To accommodate the error of visible baptism of desire Cardinal Ratzinger changed the Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and Canon Law 1 He now refers to all this irrationality and innovation as Catholic 'doctrine' and wants the SSPX to compromise with his heresy and this obeisance to the Masons.
He made sure that in the parishes they affirm orthodox passages in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which say all need faith and baptism for salvation(see blue passages below) but with the red passages in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 interpreted as being explicit instead of implicit, visible instead of invisible.So they contradict each other and also the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is contradicted.
AD GENTES,VATICAN COUNCIL II
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5)-Ad Gentes 7
Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him-Ad Gentes 7
So there is concern and confusion in the parishes when it is pointed out that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance can really be interpreted as being invisible instead of visible.
This was not how Pope Benedict and ecclesiastical Masonry interpreted the red passages in Vatican Council II and changed Canon Law to support a deception.It was kept hidden. It was top secret.
For me, all Hindus, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Protestants and other non Catholics are on the way to Hell.This is magisterial in Ad Gentes 7.
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5).Ad Gentes 7
And for me the following passages refer to invisible people in 2017.They are references to hypothetical cases which for me should be followed by the baptism of water since this is the dogmatic teaching of the Church.
Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him-Ad Gentes 7
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her.-Lumen Gentium 14
To include these red passages in Vatican Council II was a mistake.The Council Fathers repeated the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 where it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in in invincible ignorance(I.I) were explicit and so were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.They had made a mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.There are no objective cases of BOD or I.I to be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
The same mistake was made by Pope Benedict in March 2016. Vatican Council II could not be a 'development' of EENS since there are no objective exceptions to EENS mentioned in the Council text.
So all Catholics should proclaim that all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics, with no exceptions in 2017, are oriented to the fires of Hell and this is a magisterial teaching according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14)
The same mistake was made by Pope Benedict in March 2016. Vatican Council II could not be a 'development' of EENS since there are no objective exceptions to EENS mentioned in the Council text.
So all Catholics should proclaim that all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics, with no exceptions in 2017, are oriented to the fires of Hell and this is a magisterial teaching according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14)
This is not a private opinion and neither do I judge any one according to my personal knowledge.
I am repeating what the Holy Spirit teaches the Church and the Holy Spirit cannot be wrong.It cannot guide the Church into innovation, false premises and heresy, as does the present magisterium of people in the Vatican Curia.
The problem is not there only in the Vatican Curia.The heresy extends to the traditionalists too.Deacon Edward Schaefer who is building a new college in the USA also follows this 'false magisterium' since he accepts the New Theology, when he interprets BOD, BOB and I.I as being explicit. For him too the red passages refer to objective cases.
Chris Ferrara and Michael Matt also use the New Theology, as did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, since they overlooked the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Rorate Caeili correspondents and Roberto dei Mattei also interpret Vatican Council II with BOD and I.I passages referring to objective people, in the present times.
Similarly Bro.Andre Marie MICM, and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Fr.Leonard Feeney's communities, interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.Since the BOD and I.I passages in Vatican Council II refer to objective cases for them.
In the Archdiocese of Detroit the theology professors at the Sacred Heart Seminary(Ralph Martin,Robert Fastiggi) and Church Militant TV, like the Chancery offices in the Archdiocese, are following this 'false magisterium', 'the false church'.If they all accepted that the red passages refer to invisible people in the present times then there would be no exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston and the St. Benedict Center of his time.Likewise the Franciscans of the Immaculate ( both groups) and the SSPX (both groups) interpret what is hypothetical as if it refers to concrete and defacto cases. This is wrong.
So they follow Pope Benedict's irrational and heretical new theology enforced with a new Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and changes in Canon Law to accommodate an error.
Summorum Pontificum 10 years back had also to be accepted with this error; with the new theology based on visible for us baptism of desire , with the red passages considered objective examples of known salvation outside the Church-Lionel Andrades
I am repeating what the Holy Spirit teaches the Church and the Holy Spirit cannot be wrong.It cannot guide the Church into innovation, false premises and heresy, as does the present magisterium of people in the Vatican Curia.
The problem is not there only in the Vatican Curia.The heresy extends to the traditionalists too.Deacon Edward Schaefer who is building a new college in the USA also follows this 'false magisterium' since he accepts the New Theology, when he interprets BOD, BOB and I.I as being explicit. For him too the red passages refer to objective cases.
Chris Ferrara and Michael Matt also use the New Theology, as did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, since they overlooked the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Rorate Caeili correspondents and Roberto dei Mattei also interpret Vatican Council II with BOD and I.I passages referring to objective people, in the present times.
Similarly Bro.Andre Marie MICM, and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Fr.Leonard Feeney's communities, interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.Since the BOD and I.I passages in Vatican Council II refer to objective cases for them.
In the Archdiocese of Detroit the theology professors at the Sacred Heart Seminary(Ralph Martin,Robert Fastiggi) and Church Militant TV, like the Chancery offices in the Archdiocese, are following this 'false magisterium', 'the false church'.If they all accepted that the red passages refer to invisible people in the present times then there would be no exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston and the St. Benedict Center of his time.Likewise the Franciscans of the Immaculate ( both groups) and the SSPX (both groups) interpret what is hypothetical as if it refers to concrete and defacto cases. This is wrong.
So they follow Pope Benedict's irrational and heretical new theology enforced with a new Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and changes in Canon Law to accommodate an error.
Summorum Pontificum 10 years back had also to be accepted with this error; with the new theology based on visible for us baptism of desire , with the red passages considered objective examples of known salvation outside the Church-Lionel Andrades
1
July 5, 2017
To accomodate the error of visible baptism of desire Cardinal Ratzinger changed the Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and Canon Law
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. In this way and by this means, the plan of God is fulfilled - that plan to which Christ conformed with loving obedience for the glory of the Father who sent Him,(18) that the whole human race might form one people of God and be built up into one temple of the Holy Spirit which, being the expression of brotherly harmony, corresponds with the inmost wishes of all men. And so at last, there will be realized the plan of our Creator who formed man to His own image and likeness, when all who share one human nature, regenerated in Christ through the Holy Spirit and beholding the glory of God, will be able to say with one accord: "Our Father."-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II
LUMEN GENTIUM 14, VATICAN COUNCIL II
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
2
AD GENTES,VATICAN COUNCIL II
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.
AD GENTES,VATICAN COUNCIL II
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. In this way and by this means, the plan of God is fulfilled - that plan to which Christ conformed with loving obedience for the glory of the Father who sent Him,(18) that the whole human race might form one people of God and be built up into one temple of the Holy Spirit which, being the expression of brotherly harmony, corresponds with the inmost wishes of all men. And so at last, there will be realized the plan of our Creator who formed man to His own image and likeness, when all who share one human nature, regenerated in Christ through the Holy Spirit and beholding the glory of God, will be able to say with one accord: "Our Father."-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II
LUMEN GENTIUM 14, VATICAN COUNCIL II
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.-Lumen Gentium 14
____________________________________
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.-Lumen Gentium 14
____________________________________
July 5, 2017
That the baptism of desire is invisible and not physically visible is a great secret of Cardinal Ladaria and others at the Vatican.For them this is very important information to hide
July 6, 2017
Everything hangs on invisible for us baptism of desire : Vatican Council II changes
July 7, 2017
Catechism of the Catholic Church, Vatican Council II, the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus indicate all Jews and Muslims in Rome are on the way to Hell http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catechism-of-catholic-church-vatican.html
JULY 5, 2017
___________________________________________
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake.Similarly mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) relative to the traditional teaching on salvation was superfluous.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
TERMS EXPLAINED
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II withCushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II withFeeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted withCushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvatioon.
Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.
Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.
________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment